Follow-the-Workload Topology

On this page

In a multi-region deployment, follow-the-workload is the default behavior for tables that do not have a table locality. In general, this is a good choice only for tables with the following requirements:

• The table is active mostly in one region at a time, e.g., following the sun.
• In the active region, read latency must be low, but write latency can be higher.
• In non-active regions, both read and write latency can be higher.
• Table data must remain available during a region failure.

Prerequisites

Fundamentals

• Multi-region topology patterns are almost always table-specific. If you haven't already, review the full range of patterns to ensure you choose the right one for each of your tables.
• Review how data is replicated and distributed across a cluster, and how this affects performance. It is especially important to understand the concept of the "leaseholder". For a summary, see Reads and Writes in CockroachDB. For a deeper dive, see the CockroachDB Architecture documentation.
• Review the concept of locality, which makes CockroachDB aware of the location of nodes and able to intelligently place and balance data based on how you define replication controls.
• Review the recommendations and requirements in our Production Checklist.
• This topology doesn't account for hardware specifications, so be sure to follow our hardware recommendations and perform a POC to size hardware for your use case.
• Adopt relevant SQL Best Practices to ensure optimal performance.

Cluster setup

Each multi-region pattern assumes the following setup:

Hardware

• 3 regions
• Per region, 3+ AZs with 3+ VMs evenly distributed across them
• Region-specific app instances and load balancers
  • Each load balancer redirects to CockroachDB nodes in its region.
  • When CockroachDB nodes are unavailable in a region, the load balancer redirects to nodes in other regions.

Cluster

Each node is started with the --locality flag specifying its region and AZ combination. For example, the following command starts a node in the west1 AZ of the us-west region:

$ cockroach start \
--locality=region=us-west,zone=west1 \
--certs-dir=certs \
--advertise-addr=<node1 internal address> \
--join=<node1 internal address>:26257,<node2 internal address>:26257,<node3 internal address>:26257 \
--cache=.25 \
--max-sql-memory=.25 \
--background

Configuration

Aside from deploying a cluster across three regions properly, with each node started with the --locality flag specifying its region and zone combination, this behavior requires no extra configuration. CockroachDB will balance the replicas for a table across the three regions and will assign the range lease to the replica in the region with the greatest demand at any given time (the follow-the-workload feature). This means that read latency in the active region will be low while read latency in other regions will be higher due to having to leave the region to reach the leaseholder. Write latency will be higher as well due to always involving replicas in multiple regions.

Characteristics

Latency

Reads

Reads in the region with the most demand will access the local leaseholder and, therefore, never leave the region. This makes read latency very low in the currently most active region. Reads in other regions, however, will be routed to the leaseholder in a different region and, thus, read latency will be higher.

For example, in the animation below, the most active region is us-east and, thus, the table's leaseholder is in that region:

1. The read request in us-east reaches the regional load balancer.
2. The load balancer routes the request to a gateway node.
3. The gateway node routes the request to the leaseholder replica.
4. The leaseholder retrieves the results and returns to the gateway node.
5. The gateway node returns the results to the client. In this case, reads in the us-east remain in the region and are lower-latency than reads in other regions.

Writes

The replicas for the table are spread across all 3 regions, so writes involve multiple network hops across regions to achieve consensus. This increases write latency significantly.

For example, in the animation below, assuming the most active region is still us-east:

1. The write request in us-east reaches the regional load balancer.
2. The load balancer routes the request to a gateway node.
3. The gateway node routes the request to the leaseholder replica.
4. While the leaseholder appends the write to its Raft log, it notifies its follower replicas.
5. As soon as one follower has appended the write to its Raft log (and thus a majority of replicas agree based on identical Raft logs), it notifies the leaseholder and the write is committed on the agreeing replicas.
6. The leaseholders then return acknowledgement of the commit to the gateway node.
7. The gateway node returns the acknowledgement to the client.

Resiliency

Because this pattern balances the replicas for the table across regions, one entire region can fail without interrupting access to the table:

See also

• Multi-Region Capabilities Overview
• Choosing a multi-region configuration
• When to use ZONE vs. REGION survival goals
• When to use REGIONAL vs. GLOBAL tables
• Multi-region SQL performance
• Migrate to Multi-region SQL
• ALTER DATABASE ... SURVIVE {ZONE,REGION} FAILURE
• ALTER TABLE ... SET LOCALITY ...
• Topology Patterns Overview
  • Single-region
    • Development
    • Basic Production
  • Multi-region
    • REGIONAL Table Locality Pattern
    • GLOBAL Table Locality Pattern
    • Follow-the-Workload

Was this helpful?